Clay v. Zeon M D et al Clay is barred from filing future filings until he has paid his full filing fee debt., No. 4:2014cv00057 - Document 34 (S.D. Tex. 2014)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER dismissing 1 Civil Rights Complaint; denying 9 MOTION for Jury Trial, denying 10 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, denying 14 MOTION for Physical Examination of Thomas H Clay, denying 15 MOTION fo r Physical & Pathogenic Blood Screen Examination of Thomas H Clay, denying 16 MOTION for Physical Examination of Thomas H Clay, denying 24 MOTION to Strike. Plaintiff is barred from future filings until the entire filing fee has been paid. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION THOMAS H. CLAY, TDCJ-CID NO. 1124123, § § § Plaintiff, § § v. DOCTOR ZAE YOUNG ZEON, et al., CIVIL ACTION NO. H-14-0057 § § § § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Thomas H. Clay, an inmate incarcerated at the Estelle Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division (TDCJ), filed a prisoner civil rights complaint alleging denial of medical care. (Docket Entry No.1) application to proceed as a pauper. He also filed an (Docket Entry No.2) Because of Clay's frivolous litigation history, the court ordered the Texas Attorney General's Office to file a report to determine if Clay is In § imminent 1915 (g) . danger After of serious reviewing physical the harm. Attorney supported by affidavits and medical records, See 28 General's U. S . C . report, and Clay's amended complaint (Docket Entry No. 33), the court has determined that this action should be dismissed because Clay is not entitled to proceed as a pauper. Id. I. A. Background and Allegations Clay's Litigation History If an inmate files federal district or three or more civil appellate courts that complaints are in the dismissed as frivolous or malicious he may not file any further civil complaints without paying the filing fee in advance unless he can show that he is "under imminent danger of serious physical injury./I § 1915(g) Clay i has 28 U.S.C. Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 385 (5th Cir. 1996). filed at least six federal prisoner civil rights complaints containing claims that were dismissed as frivolous. Although in some instances Clay's complaints ultimately 1 were dismissed for want of prosecution, the district court had dismissed as frivolous at least some of the claims presented in each of his cases. of § Consequently, the dismissals count as strikes for purposes 1915(g). 2003) . Comeaux v. Cockrell, 72 F. App'x 54, 55-56 (5th Cir. Clay has since filed a civil rights complaint that was dismissed pursuant to § 1915 (g) . Clay v. Correctional Managed Health Care/UTMB, No. G-05-569 (S.D. Tex. 2005). lClay v. Nueces County Jail Sheriff's Dept., No. C-01-0158 (S.D. Tex. 2002); Clay v. Vasquez, No. C-01-0135 (S.D. Tex. 2002) i Clay v. Christus Spohn Memorial, No. C-01-002 (S.D. Tex. 2001) (dismissed partially as frivolous; partially on summary judgment for Clay's failure to show deliberate indifference to medical needs); Clay v. Nueces County Jail, No. C-00-477 (S.D. Tex. 2002) i Clay v. Ramos, No. C-00-0409 (S.D. Tex. 2002) i Clay v. Ingle, No. C-96-0133 (S.D. Tex. 1997). -2 - B. Clay's Allegations - Denial of Medical Care Clay has been notified that he cannot proceed in a civil rights action without paying the filing fee in advance unless he can demonstrate bodily harm. that he is presently in imminent danger of serious See Clay v. Correctional Managed Health Care/UTMB. With this knowledge he has drafted his original complaint seeking an exemption to Clay § 1915(g) 's bar. alleges that a See Docket Entry No. I, p. 1. blood screen culture was taken on April 19, 2013, which revealed "positive cocci cluster of numerous gram negative bacilli and rare epithelial cells H and "predominant potential H pathogens of a providencia [sic] stuartii serratia rd. at 2. He contends that this finding indicates the presence of an infectious disease, which he believes was brought about by some form of food poisoning. the test results, he Clay alleges that despite has been denied effective medication and therapy to combat the infection. He further claims that doctors have refused to see or treat him although he is suffering and is in danger of dying. rd. at 3. He also alleges that he became sick and lost 35 pounds because pathogens were placed in his meals in order to retaliate against him. the health conditions rd. Because of the seriousness of alleged by Clay, the court ordered the Attorney General to file a report on Clay's condition and the care provided him at the prison. -3- C. Clay's Amended Complaint (Docket Entry No. 33) In response to the Attorney General's report (Docket Entry No. 27), Clay filed a 123-page amended complaint naming at least 45 individuals, as well as other unnamed officials 1 alleging other events and conditions that are purported to show that he is in imminent danger of physical inj ury or (Docket death. 2 Entry Throughout the pleading Clay reiterates Nos. 33, 33-1, and 33-2) his claim that officials have attempted to poison him and have deliberately denied him medical care for his condition. Docket Entry No. 33 1 pp. 3-4, 6 9-10 1 1 16. See 1 ~, He alleges that the poisoning was done in retaliation for his exercise of his right to practice his Muslim religion. Id. at 41 13. Clay makes other allegations in support of his claim that he is being retaliated against for being a Muslim. he was denied access to outdoor recreation He complains that and placed in an administrative segregation housing area known for violent activity. rd. at 4, 11, 15, 19, 21. He also complains of lack of access to medical services and religious meals. rd. Clay claims that his First and Fourteenth Amendment Rights were violated when he was 2Cl ay also denies that he has ever had a case or appeal that was dismissed as frivolous or malicious and therefore he is not barred by § 1915(g). (Docket Entry No. 33 p. 5) Clay presents no evidence in support of his argument. The court has examined federal district clerks' records which show that Clay has filed multiple suits that have been dismissed with claims held to be frivolous. See United States v. Cantu, 167 F.3d 198, 204 (5th Cir. 1999) . 1 l -4 - ---- ---,._--_ ..- . denied access to the Estelle Unit Law Library and Mail Room. 7. rd. at He also claims that his right to practice his Muslim religion has been impeded by denying him special meals during Ramadan. at 8, 16. Clay alleges that he was deprived of his legal materials and that his personal property was confiscated without cause. at 16, 18. rd. rd. Clay also complains that he was subjected to retaliatory disciplinary action based on false charges. rd. at 26. The amended complaint generally consists of repetitions of the above allegations against the numerous defendants. Many of the allegations fail to establish an actionable claim. Clay's complaint about the alleged unauthorized taking property does not support a constitutional violation. Dretke, 587 F.3d 764, 768 (5th Cir. 2009). of his Brewster v. His complaint that he was subjected to false disciplinary action is also baseless because he fails to show that he was subjected to an atypical deprivation. See Malchi v. Thaler, 211 F.3d 953, 958 (5th Cir. 2000). Clay's assertion that the acts are retaliatory are not based on any facts that show that the defendants' actions were based on their knowledge of Clay's religious affiliation or that they were even aware that Clay was a Muslim. 1998)i McDonald v. Steward, 132 F.3d 225, 231 (5th Cir. see also McFaul v. Valenzuela, 684 F.3d 564, 578 (5th Cir. 2012) i Shelton v. Lemons, 486 F. App' x 395, 397-398 (5th Cir. 2012). Clay also fails to allege any facts that indicate that he was in danger of physical harm when he filed his complaint with regard to his claims that he was denied access to recreation, -5- religious services r the law librarYr or the mail room. See Adepegba r 103 F.3d at 385; Bell v. Livingston r 356 F. App'x 715 r 2009). 716 (5th Cir. Many of the alleged violations occurred well before the December 26, 2013, filing date. Some of the incidents occurred more than a year before the pleading was submitted. Docket Entry No. 33 r pp. 11r 17: Seer ~r denial of access to religious services and Ramadan meals from August 3 r 2012 r through August 19 r 2012; Docket Entry No. 33, p. 16: removal from cell and taking of legal documents and personal property on October 16, 2012. Apart from failing to indicate any endangerment, such acts are too remote in time to qualify as "imminent." F.3d 1068, 1071 See Choyce v. Dominguez, 160 (5th Cir. 1998); see also Ball v. F.3d 448, 467 (3d Cir. 2013) Famiglio, ('''Imminent' dangers are those dangers which are about to occur at any moment or are impending. II) Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvie, 726 239 F.3d 307, 315 (3d r quoting Cir. 2001). Therefore r only Clayrs allegations regarding lack of medical care for an infection will be considered when reviewing the Attorney General's report. II. The Attorney General's Report Pursuant to the courtrs order, the Attorney General submitted a Martinez 3 report and an amended report detailing Clay's medical condition and the medical care given to him in reference to his allegations of deliberate indifference to his serious health needs. 3 Mart inez v. Aaron, 570 F.2d 317 (lOth Cir. 1978). -6- (Docket Entry Nos. 18 Included with the and 27) reports are medical records (filed under seal) relating to Clay's condition and treatment as alleged in the complaint. 29) An affidavit treatment The of Steven Bowers, (Docket Entry Nos. 20 and M.D., relating to Clay's (Docket Entry No. 18-2) has also been submitted. medical records show that Clay was seen and treated regularly in response to various complaints and ailments including possible allergies. See,~, Docket Entry No. 29-6, pp. 18-27. Although treatment was made available to him, March 20, 2013. Clay refused it on On March 25, 2013, Clay submitted a Id. at 18. sick call request reporting physical difficulties stemming from what he believed were substances in his food. Id. at 16. Clay was brought to the clinic for treatment on March 31, 2013, but he became verbally agitated and had to be removed by security. Id. at 15. On April 4, 2013, Clay submitted a sick call complaining about a "hole in [his] ankle" and repeating his belief that he was the victim of food poisoning. (Docket Entry No. 29-6, p. 14) A health care worker responded that Clay had been seen on February 23, 2013, and changes had been made to his diet. sick calIon April 6, 2013. Id. Id. at 13. only of the hole in his ankle. Clay submitted another This time he complained Id. Clay's sick call about his ankle was received on April 7, 2013, and a nurse examined him two days later. Id. at 6-12. Clay did not exhibit any signs of acute distress when he was examined although he did have a small lesion on his left ankle and had some -7- ----------------'---------- ----------------- trouble walking. (Docket Entry No. 29-6, p. 10) Clay speculated that the holes developed because he was wearing his "Jackie Chan" shoes. Id. After noting that the alleged culprit shoes did not come in contact with the affected area and that Clay did not appear to be in serious condition, the attending nurse instructed him to keep the wound clean and dry and to advise the health clinic if his condition worsened. Id. nurse's but diagnosis, Clay was apparently dissatisfied with the he indicated that instructions and departed from the clinic. tall (6 1") I, April 9. and weighed 2 04 he Id. understood her Clay was 73 inches pounds when he was examined on Id. at 6. Clay was scheduled for a follow-up visit on April 12, 2013, but he did not show because no escort was available. No. 29-6, p. 5) Clay was seen on April 15, culture was taken from Clay's left foot. No. 18-2, p. The 3. infection in his left test results ankle. and a wound 2013, Id. at 1; Docket Entry revealed (Docket (Docket Entry that Entry No. Clay had an 29-5, Dr. Nathaniel Robertson saw Clay the next day and, Clay's condition antibiotics and to combat examining the the test infection. Id. 63) after noting results, at p. 63-64. prescribed He also ordered ankle x-rays, blood work, daily wound care with periodic saline rinses and changes of the bandaging, pain. and Tylenol #3 for Id. Pursuant to Dr. Robertson's order, medical providers continued to monitor Clay's condition and -8- provide treatment including prescribed antibiotics until his left ankle condition healed over the next eight months. Nos. 29-4 and 29-5) (Docket Entry No. 18-2, p. 3i Docket Entry Clay was provided wound dressing changes and wound care on numerous occasions until the ankle fully healed. was also treated for other complaints including received when he stuck his hand in a cell slot. No. 29- 5, p. 9. an He injury he See Docket Entry In addition, Clay was also provided dental care for a tooth infection. See Docket Entry No. 29-3, pp. 21-22. Clay was also treated for a back ailment although he refused to be taken (Docket Entry to the UTMB Hospital in Galveston for treatment. No. 29-2, pp. 18-19) When Clay was examined on January 14, 2014, his ankle showed no sign of infection, and he was walking with a (Docket Entry No. 29-1, p. 20) no problems. Id. stable gate. At that time, Clay appeared to have He had previously been weighed on January 9, 2014, and weighed 195 pounds. Id. at 28. Clay's medical records indicated that the medical treatment provided was appropriate and performed within ailments. the standard of medical care needed for his (Docket Entry No. 18 -2, p. 4) III. Analysis Prison inmates have a right to the Eighth Amendment. "adequate medical care" under Coleman v. Sweetin, 745 F.3d 756, 765 (5th Cir. 2014), citing Rogers v. Boatright, 709 F.3d 403, 409 (5th Cir. 2013) . Prison officials may violate this right if they exhibit -9- "deliberate indifference to a prisoner's serious medical needs. rd. citing Easter v. Powell, 467 F.3d 459, 97 S. Ct. 285, 292 463 H (5th Cir. 2006); "To establish Estelle v. Gamble, (1976). deliberate indifference defendants (1) were aware of facts from which an inference of an the prisoner must show that the excessive risk to the prisoner's health or safety could be drawn and (2) that they actually drew an inference that such potential Bradley v. Puckett, 157 F.3d 1022, 1025 (5th Cir. 1998), citing Farmer v. Brennan, 114 S. Ct. 1970 (1994). The for harm existed. H standard for deliberate indifference is high and requires more than a showing of negligence; there must be a showing that the defendants were criminally reckless in failing to respond to a situation in which they were aware substantial risk of serious harm. that a prisoner 105 F.3d 1059, 1061 a Domino v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, 239 F.3d 752, 756 (5th Cir. 1999) Stalder, faced (5th Cir. 1997); i McCormick v. Hare v. City of Clay's general Corinth, Miss., 74 F.3d 633, 645 (5th Cir. 1996) The allegation Attorney that he General's had an Report infection, confirms although the infection occurred because of an ankle wound -- not food poisoning. If the health care workers had not attended to Clay's ankle wound, failure to provide treatment could raise the issue of whether this omission was the result of deliberate indifference. See Coleman, 745 F.3d at 766; Gobert v. Caldwell, 463 F.3d 339, 345 n.12 (5th Cir. 2006); see also Fuller v. Harris County, -10- 137 F. App'x 677, 678-79 (5th Cir. 2005); Mata v. Saiz, 427 F.3d 745, 751 (lOth Cir. 2005) (A \\'medical need is sufficiently serious if it is one that has been diagnosed by a physician as mandating treatment or one that is so obvious that even a lay person would easily recognize the necessity for a doctor's attention.'"), quoting Sealock v. Colorado, 218 F.3d 1205, 1209 (10th Cir. 2000). Although the serious medical report and records condition that indicate that needed attention, Clay had a there is no evidence that prison officials ignored his condition. The records, supported that by Dr. Bowers' affidavit, demonstrate Clay's infection was continuously monitored until his wound was healed. Moreover, there is no indication that Clay had been subjected to food poisoning, deliberate or otherwise. Clay's allegation that he lost 35 pounds is refuted by the record which reflects that Clay lost no more than 9 pounds or less than 5% of his total body weight. While Clay's condition was serious, there is no indication that the condition was the result of deliberate indifference by prison custodians or health care workers responsible for his care. In addition, there is no support for any finding that Clay was in imminent danger of serious bodily harm when he filed his complaint. Disagreement reasonable with a doctor's diagnosis does or not other support health a care claim of provider's deliberate indifference; nor does it suggest imminent physical endangerment. See Sama v. Hannigan, 669 F.3d 585, -11- 590-591 (5th Cir. 2012); Gobert, 463 F.3d at Clay's 346. unsupported insufficient to warrant an exception to bar against him. 2003). § are 1915(g) 's three strikes Martin v. Shelton, 319 F.3d 1048, 1050 (8th Cir. Consequently, Clay has failed to show that he is eligible to proceed as a pauper. In addition, Choyce, 160 F.3d at 1071. Clay has misstated his litigation history by denying ever receiving frivolous dismissals. p. allegations In 5) reviewing prisoner pleadings (Docket Entry No. 33, the courts liberally construe the pleadings and generally accept all allegations as true. However, the courts may take judicial notice of related court proceedings and records when determining the validity of the claims before them. MacMillan Bloedel Ltd. v. Flintkote Co., 760 F.2d 580, 587-88 (5th Cir. 1985). Given Clay's litigation history his dishonesty regarding previous suits, and the mUltiple claims unrelated to imminent physical danger contained in the complaints in this action, his allegation of imminent danger is so lacking in credibility that he will be denied permission to proceed in forma pauperis. Clay will be required to pay the entire filing fee as soon as funds are available. 990, 991 (5th Cir. 2008), See Branum v. Fontenot, 288 citing Williams v. Roberts, F. App'x 116 F.3d 1126, 1128 (5th Cir. 1997). Therefore, this action will be dismissed, and Clay will be barred from any future filings until he has paid his full filing fee debt except against him, (1) filings in any criminal proceeding brought (2) a timely filed reconsideration motion showing why -12- ----------_.__._-_._-_ _---------------.. the sanction should not be applied to himl and (3) any appeal of the Final Judgment entered in this action. 181 F. App/x 808 809 (11th Cir. 2006). 1 See Mathis v. Smith l The TDCJ Inmate Trust Fund shall be instructed to withdraw Four Hundred Dollars ($400.00) from Clay/s Inmate Trust Account. Clay may not withdraw any funds from the account until the sanction is paid. IV. Conclusion The court ORDERS the following: 1. The prisoner civil rights complaint (Docket Entry No.1) as amended by Docket Entry No. 33 filed by TDCJ Inmate Thomas Clay TDCJ No. 1124123 is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). I 1 I I 2. Clayl s Motion in Demand for Jury Trial (Docket Entry No.9); Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Docket Entry No. 10); motions for physical examination of Clay (Docket Entry Nos. 14 and 16); motion for pathogenic blood screen (Docket Entry No. 15); and Motion to Strike (Docket Entry No. 24) are DENIED. 3. Clay shall pay the full $400.00 filing fee to the Clerk of this Court. 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (b) (1). 4. The TDCJ-CID Inmate Trust fund shall place a hold on ClavI s trust account (No. 1124123) until the entire filing fee ($400.00) has accumulated in the account. At that time, the Inmate Trust Fund shall forward $400.00 to the Clerk pursuant to this Memorandum Opinion and Order. 5. Except as noted above Clay is BARRED from future filings until the entire filing fee has been paid. 6. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to the parties; the TDCJ Office of the General Counsell P.O. I -13- Box 13084, Austin, Texas 78711, Fax Number 512-9362159; the TDCJ Inmate Trust Fund, P.O. Box 60, Huntsville, Texas 77342-0060, Fax Number 936-4374793; and the Pro Se Clerk's Office for the United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, 211 West Ferguson, Tyler, Texas 75702 by mail, fax, or electronic means. SIGNED at Houston, Texas, on this 20th day of August, 2014. SIM LAKE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -14-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
