R N D PRODUCTIONS INC. v. Seeley et al, No. 4:2013cv01751 - Document 84 (S.D. Tex. 2014)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT entered. Case terminated on 9/16/14.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
R N D PRODUCTIONS INC. v. Seeley et al Doc. 84 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION R N D PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, VS. ANDREW SEELEY and WALT DISNEY COMPANY Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-13-01751 FINAL JUDGMENT On January 31, 2014, this court held a hearing at which counsel presented argument on the motion to dismiss filed by Walt Disney Company for lack of personal jurisdiction and failure to state a claim, (Docket Entry No. 20), and Andrew Seeley’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, (Docket Entry No. 21). The court granted both motions from the bench, finding that the Walt Disney entity sued was not subject to personal jurisdiction in Texas and that limitations barred the claims asserted. Counsel for the plaintiff stated that he would amend to delete Walt Disney entity sued and instead to name the Texas affiliate. Counsel for the plaintiff also asked for, and received, leave to file an amended pleading or other documents that would overcome the clear limitations bar. The court set a deadline of February 21, 2014 for any amended pleading and supplement to the opposition to the motions to dismiss. No amended pleading or supplement has been filed. Based on the pleadings, the motions to dismiss and the responses, the arguments of counsel, and the applicable law, this court dismisses this case, with prejudice. The court finds that limitations precludes the relief sought as to both defendants and that this Texas court lacks jurisdiction over the Dockets.Justia.com Walt Disney entity named as one of the defendants. The motions to dismiss are granted, with prejudice. This is a final judgment. SIGNED on September 16, 2014, at Houston, Texas. ______________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
