Edwards v. Certain Underwriters At Lloyds et al, No. 4:2010cv03533 - Document 104 (S.D. Tex. 2012)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT entered. This case is dismissed with prejudice. Case terminated on 8/8/12(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )

Download PDF
Edwards v. Certain Underwriters At Lloyds et al Doc. 104 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION CHERYL EDWARDS, § § Plaintiff, § § VS. § § CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, § et al., § Defendants. § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-10-3533 FINAL JUDGMENT For the reasons stated in detail on the record after counsel for the parties presented oral argument on the pending motions, this court: (1) denied the plaintiff’s motion to disqualify the umpire and to vacate the previous court order compelling appraisal, (Docket Entry No. 83); (2) granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, (Docket Entry No. 87), see Blum’s Furniture Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, 459 F. App’x 366 (5th Cir. 2012) (per curiam); (3) granted the plaintiff’s motion to lift the stay to the extent of ruling on the pending motions, (Docket Entry No. 88); (4) denied the plaintiff’s motion for continuance on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, (Docket Entry No. 89); and (5) denied the plaintiff’s motion to set aside the appraisal award, (Docket Entry No. 92). This action is dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to bear its own costs and fees. This is a final judgment. SIGNED on August 8, 2012, at Houston, Texas. ______________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.