Bank Of America, N.A. v. Alliance PP2 FX1 Limited Partnership, No. 4:2009cv02371 - Document 18 (S.D. Tex. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE entered. This case may be reinstated to this courts active docket when the receivers work is complete and the parties are ready to enter a final judgment or dismissal, or when there is a need for the courts involv ement, whichever occurs earlier. The receiver must file a report with this court on the status of its work no later than September 3, 2010, if the case has not been finally closed by that date. Case terminated on 3/12/10.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Bank Of America, N.A. v. Alliance PP2 FX1 Limited Partnership Doc. 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as Trustee for the Registered Holders of Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities, Plaintiff, v. ALLIANCE PP2 FX1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-09-2371 ORDER STAYING AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE PENDING CONCLUSION OF RECEIVER’S WORK This court appointed a receiver in this case. The receiver is repairing the property and will then sell it. Given the status of this work, the reports made by the receiver, and the position of other parties in interest, this court stays this case and administratively closes it pending the completion of the receiver’s work. This case may be reinstated to this court’s active docket when the receiver’s work is complete and the parties are ready to enter a final judgment or dismissal, or when there is a need for the court’s involvement, whichever occurs earlier. The receiver must file a report with this court on the status of its work no later than September 3, 2010, if the case has not been finally closed by that date. SIGNED on March 12, 2010, at Houston, Texas. ______________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
