Stewart et al v. City Of Houston Police Department et al, No. 4:2007cv04021 - Document 55 (S.D. Tex. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER entered ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT: GRANTING Defts. MOTION for Summary Judgment. FINAL JUDGMENT entered. This case is dismissed with prejudice. Case terminated on 9/3/09.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Stewart et al v. City Of Houston Police Department et al Doc. 55 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION SHELBY STEWART, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF HOUSTON and CITY OF HOUSTON CHIEF OF POLICE HAROLD HURTT, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-07-4021 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION AND ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT This court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge signed on August 7, 2009. The court has also considered the objections of the plaintiffs filed on March 9, 2009 and made a de novo determination. Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P.; 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir. 1989). Based on the record and the applicable law, this court overrules the plaintiffs’ objections to the Memorandum and Recommendation and adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation as this court’s Memorandum and Order. Accordingly, it is ordered that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted and the plaintiffs’ claims are dismissed, with prejudice. This is a final judgment. SIGNED on September 3, 2009, at Houston, Texas. ______________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
