Kopatz v. Director TDCJ-CID, No. 2:2018cv00232 - Document 62 (S.D. Tex. 2018)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER denying 58 Motion for Appointment of Counsel.(Signed by Magistrate Judge B Janice Ellington) Parties notified.(sylopez, 2)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Kopatz v. Director TDCJ-CID Doc. 62 United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION BRIAN KOPATZ, Plaintiff, VS. DIRECTOR TDCJ-CID, Defendant. § § § § § § § § September 13, 2018 David J. Bradley, Clerk CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-CV-232 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL In this habeas corpus petition, Petitioner requests appointment of counsel and investigative resources (D.E. 58). There is no constitutional right to counsel in federal habeas proceedings. Johnson v. Hargett, 978 F.2d 855 (5th Cir. 1992). Rule 8 of the rules Governing § 2254 Cases requires that counsel be appointed if the habeas petition raises issues which mandate an evidentiary hearing. Respondent filed a motion to dismiss Petitioner's cause of action as time-barred on February 28, 2018 and the motion is still pending. At this point no issues mandate an evidentiary hearing. An evidentiary hearing will be scheduled and counsel will be assigned sua sponte if there are issues which mandate a hearing. Moreover, counsel may be assigned if discovery is ordered and issues necessitating the assignment of counsel are evident. Rule 6(a) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; Thomas v. Scott, 47 F.3d 713, 715 n. 1 (5th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (D.E. 58) is denied without prejudice. 1/2 Dockets.Justia.com All relief not granted by this order is DENIED. ORDERED this 12th day of September, 2018. ___________________________________ B. JANICE ELLINGTON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2/2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
