McClenton v. TDCJ
Filing
9
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS re: 8 Memorandum and Recommendation.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(mserpa, )
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
JAMES H. MCCLENTON,
Plaintiff,
VS.
TDCJ,
Defendant.
§
§
§
§ CIVIL ACTION NO. C-11-403
§
§
§
§
ORDER ADOPTING
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS
On February 22, 2012, United States Magistrate Judge Brian L. Owsley issued his
“Memorandum and Recommendations to Dismiss” (D.E. 8). The Plaintiff was provided
proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and
Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 200213. No objections have been filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear
error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005)
(citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the
Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 8), and all other relevant
documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the
1/2
findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
ORDERED this 14th day of March, 2012.
___________________________________
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2/2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
