Carter v H2R Restaurant Holdings LLC et al, No. 3:2016cv01554 - Document 292 (N.D. Tex. 2017)
Court Description: Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 275 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 252 Motion for Judgment filed by Samantha Carter. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted. It is further ordered that Plaintiff Carter's Motion for Judgment on the pleadings 252 is denied. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 11/6/2017) (ndt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Carter v H2R Restaurant Holdings LLC et al Doc. 292 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SAMANTHA CARTER, § § Plaintiff, § § V. § § H2R RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, LLC, § ET AL., § § Defendants. § No. 3:16-cv-1554-N-BN ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated October 4, 2017, the Court finds that the Findings Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Court. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted. It is further ordered that Plaintiff Carter’s Motion for Judgment on the pleadings [252] is denied. SO ORDERED this 6th day of November, 2017. _____________________________________ DAVID C. GODBEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
