WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al, No. 6:2010cv00521 - Document 471 (E.D. Tex. 2013)

Court Description: AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 07/22/13. (mll, ) (Entered: 07/22/2013)

Download PDF
WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al Doc. 471 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION WI-LAN INC., Plaintiff, vs. ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC., ET AL., Defendants. WI-LAN INC., Plaintiff, vs. HTC CORPORATION, ET AL., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:10-CV-521 CASE NO. 6:13-CV-252 AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT This action was tried by a jury with the undersigned presiding, and the jury has reached a verdict. It is ORDERED that Defendants Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.; Ericsson Inc.; and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson did not infringe the following claims: Claims 2, 5, and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 6,088,326; Claims 11 and 12 of U.S. Patent No. 6,195,327; and Claim 11 of U.S. Patent No. 6,222,819. Dockets.Justia.com It is also ORDERED that Defendants HTC Corporation; HTC America, Inc.; Exedea Inc.; Sony Mobile Communications AB; and Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. did not infringe the following claims: Claims 2 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,381,211. It is further ORDERED that the following claims are invalid: Claims 2, 5, and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 6,088,326; Claim 11 of U.S. Patent No. 6,222,819; and Claims 2 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,381,211. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff Wi-Lan Inc. take nothing from Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.; Ericsson Inc.; Telefonaktiebolaget LM . Ericsson; HTC Corporation; HTC America, Inc.; Exedea Inc.; Sony Mobile Communications AB; and Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) and that all pending motions are DENIED. It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants’ costs of court should be taxed against Plaintiff. The parties are directed to the Standing Order Regarding Bill of Costs on the Court’s website. SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 22nd day of July, 2013.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.