Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al, No. 6:2009cv00446 - Document 1417 (E.D. Tex. 2012)
Court Description: AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT. Claims 1 and 6 of U.S. Patent No. 5,838,906 are found to be invalid. Claims 1, 3, 10, 16, 18, 20, 22, 36, 38, 40, and 42 of U.S. Patent No. 7,599,985 are found to be invalid. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs take nothing from Amazon.com Inc.; Google Inc.; J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.; Yahoo! Inc.; and YouTube, LLC and that all pending motions are DENIED. Plaintiffs claims for infringement are dismissed with prejudice based on Defendants invalidity affirmative defense, and Defendants counterclaims other than for invalidity are hereby dismissed without prejudice as moot. Defendants costs of court should be taxed against Plaintiffs. The parties are directed to the Standing Order Regarding Bill of Costs on the Courts website. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 07/19/12. cc:attys 7-20-12(mll, ) (Entered: 07/20/2012)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al Doc. 1417 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED and THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiffs, vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC., AMAZON.COM INC., CDW CORPORATION, CITIGROUP INC., THE GO DADDY GROUP, INC., GOOGLE INC., J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC., STAPLES, INC., YAHOO! INC., AND YOUTUBE, LLC., CASE NO. 6:09-CV-446 Defendants. AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT The Invalidity and Inequitable Conduct trial was tried in this action with the undersigned presiding, and the jury has reached a verdict regarding invalidity. It is ORDERED that: Claims 1 and 6 of U.S. Patent No. 5,838,906 are found to be invalid. Claims 1, 3, 10, 16, 18, 20, 22, 36, 38, 40, and 42 of U.S. Patent No. 7,599,985 are found to be invalid. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs take nothing from Amazon.com Inc.; Google Inc.; J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.; Yahoo! Inc.; and YouTube, LLC (“Defendants”) and that all pending motions are DENIED. It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs’ claims for infringement are dismissed with prejudice based on Defendants’ invalidity affirmative defense, and Defendants’ counterclaims other than for invalidity are hereby dismissed without prejudice as moot. 1 McKool 443729v1 Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that Defendants’ costs of court should be taxed against Plaintiffs. The parties are directed to the Standing Order Regarding Bill of Costs on the Court’s website. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 19th day of July, 2012. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE McKool 443729v1
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
