Centum Electronics, Ltd. v. Datamatic, Ltd. et al, No. 4:2012cv00464 - Document 17 (E.D. Tex. 2013)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 14 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Centum Electronics, Ltd., 16 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff Centum Electronics Ltd.s Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 14) is GRANTED and final judgment shall be entered for Plaintiff as proposed(see Dkt. 14-5). Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 3/6/13. (cm, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Centum Electronics, Ltd. v. Datamatic, Ltd. et al Doc. 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION CENTUM ELECTRONICS, LTD. § § § § § § § § § § Plaintiff, VS. DATAMATIC, LTD. and DATAMATIC GROUP, INC. Defendants. Case No. 4:12cv464 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On December 21, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff Centum Electronic’s Ltd.’s Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 14) be GRANTED and final judgment should be entered for Plaintiff as proposed (see Dkt. 14-5). Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the court. Therefore, Plaintiff Centum Electronic’s Ltd.’s Amended Motion for Summary 1 Dockets.Justia.com Judgment (Dkt. 14) is GRANTED and final judgment shall be entered for Plaintiff as proposed (see Dkt. 14-5). IT IS SO ORDERED. . SIGNED this the 6th day of March, 2013. _______________________________ RICHARD A. SCHELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
