Renwick et al v. Bonnema et al, No. 2:2008cv00337 - Document 115 (E.D. Tex. 2009)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - before the court is Millennium Plas Motion 36 for extension of time to respond. The Motion is GRANTED. The plaintiffs request for fees incurred to effectuate service is DENIED. While it is clear to the court that the parties have failed to meaningfully communicate to move the case along, it is not all together clear that plaintiffs followed the necessary procedures to effectuate service pursuant to the ERISA plan, or that the Plan actually refused waiver or acted in bad faith. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 2/24/09. (ch, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MALCOLM RENWICK AND RENWICK & § ASSOCIATES, P.C., § Plaintiffs, § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08-CV-337 (TJW) v. § § ARCHER D. BONNEMA, et. al,. § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the court is Millennium Plan s Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 36). The Motion is GRANTED. The plaintiffs request for fees incurred to effectuate service is DENIED. While it is clear to the court that the parties have failed to meaningfully communicate to move the case along, it is not all together clear that plaintiffs followed the necessary procedures to effectuate service pursuant to the ERISA plan, or that the Plan actually refused waiver or acted in bad faith. SIGNED this 24th day of February, 2009. __________________________________________ T. JOHN WARD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.