Pacheco-Morales v. Norsworthy et al, No. 1:2021cv00301 - Document 3 (E.D. Tex. 2021)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding venue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 6/16/2021. (bjc, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Pacheco-Morales v. Norsworthy et al Doc. 3 Case 1:21-cv-00301-MAC-ZJH Document 3 Filed 06/16/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION HECTOR PACHECO-MORALES § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:21cv301 SENIOR WARDEN NORSWORTHY, ET AL. § MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING VENUE Plaintiff Hector Pacheco-Morales, an inmate at the LeBlanc Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Senior Warden Norsworthy, Lieutenant Lopez, Captain Buchanek, Major Dronuka, and A. McCke, all employed at the Ramsey Unit. The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States Magistrate Judge for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case. Discussion Plaintiff complains of incidents which occurred while he was confined at the Ramsey Unit. Analysis The Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §1981, et seq., under which this case is brought, does not contain a specific venue provision. Accordingly, venue in civil rights cases is controlled by 28 U.S.C. § 1391. Jones v. Bailey, 58 F.R.D. 453 (N.D. Ga. 1972), aff’d per curium, 480 F.2d 805 (5th Cir. 1973). Plaintiff does not assert jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. When jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1391 provides that venue is proper only Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:21-cv-00301-MAC-ZJH Document 3 Filed 06/16/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 21 in the judicial district where the defendants reside or in which the claim arose. Plaintiff is currently confined at the LeBlanc Unit located in Beaumont, Texas. However, his claims arose at the Ramsey Unit located in Rosharon, Brazoria County, Texas. Additionally, the prison defendants are located in Rosharon, Texas. When public officials are parties to an action in their official capacities, they reside for venue purposes in the county where they perform their official duties, which in this case is Brazoria County. Holloway v. Gunnell, 685 F.2d 150 (5th Cir. 1982); Lowrey v. Estelle, 433 F.2d 265 (5th Cir. 1976). In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 124, Brazoria County, Texas is located within the jurisdictional boundaries of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division. As Rosharon, Texas is located within the jurisdictional boundaries of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, venue in the Eastern District of Texas is not proper. When venue is not proper, the court “shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought.” 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). This case should be transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division. An appropriate order so providing will be entered by the undersigned. SIGNED this 16th day of June, 2021. _________________________ Zack Hawthorn United States Magistrate Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
