Williams v. Fiorillo et al, No. 1:2019cv00136 - Document 11 (E.D. Tex. 2021)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding dismissal of this action for want of prosecution. If pltf wishes to have this case reopened, he may do so by paying the initial partial filing fee or showing he is unable to do so within 30 days of the date. Signed by District Judge Thad Heartfield on 2/24/21. (tkd, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Williams v. Fiorillo et al Doc. 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION ANTHONY D. WILLIAMS § VS. § J. FIORILLO § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19cv136 MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Anthony D. Williams, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit. Procedural Background The court previously entered an order granting plaintiff an extension of time to pay an initial partial filing fee. The extension of time has expired. However, plaintiff has not paid the initial partial filing fee or otherwise contacted the court. Discussion Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with any court order. Larson v. Scott, 157 F.3d 1030, 1031 (5th Cir. 1998). “This authority [under Rule 41(b)] flows from the court's inherent power to control its docket and prevent undue delays in the disposition of pending cases.” Boudwin v. Graystone Insurance Co., Ltd., 756 F.2d 399, 401 (5th Cir. 1985) (citing Link v. Wabash, R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629 (1962)). By failing to comply with the court’s order, plaintiff has failed to diligently prosecute this case. As a result, this case will dismissed for want of prosecution. A final judgment shall be entered. If plaintiff wishes to have this case reopened, he may do so by paying the initial partial filing fee or showing he is unable to do so within 30 days of the date set forth below. SIGNED this the 24 day of February, 2021. ____________________________ Thad Heartfield United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
