Smith v. Rutherford County Adult Detention Center et al, No. 3:2016cv01277 - Document 3 (M.D. Tenn. 2016)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 6/14/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)

Download PDF
Smith v. Rutherford County Adult Detention Center et al Doc. 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION STEVE L. SMITH Plaintiff, v. RUTHERFORD COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER, et al. Defendants. ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] No. 3:16-1277 Judge Campbell MEMORANDUM The plaintiff, proceeding pro se, is an inmate at the Rutherford County Adult Detention Center in Murfreesboro, Tennessee. He brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Rutherford County Adult Detention Center and Chad Willingham, an inmate trustee in the plaintiff’s housing unit, seeking injunctive relief and damages. As a trustee, Willingham is charged with the task of passing out food trays in the plaintiff’s housing unit. The plaintiff alleges that Willingham has tampered with his food tray on several occasions, often taking food off the trays and leaving him hungry. To establish a claim for § 1983 relief, the plaintiff must plead and prove that a person or persons, while acting under color of state law, deprived him of some right guaranteed by the Constitution or laws of the United States. Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 535 (1981). A county jail such as the Rutherford County Adult Detention Center is not a person that can be sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Grimmett v. Wilson County Jail, 2015 WL 787228 (M.D. Tenn.); 1 Dockets.Justia.com Staggs v. Lewis County Jail, 2009 WL 3877682 (M.D. Tenn.); see also Petty v. County of Franklin, Ohio, 478 F.3d 341, 347 (6th Cir. 2007)(a county sheriff’s department is also not a “person” subject to liability under § 1983). Nor does an inmate trustee act under color of state law when he distributes food trays to other inmates. Accordingly, the plaintiff has failed to state an actionable claim under § 1983 against these defendants. Under such circumstances, the Court is obliged to dismiss the complaint sua sponte. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). An appropriate order will be entered. ______________________________ Todd Campbell United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.