Teasley v. Correctional Medical Services et al, No. 3:2011cv00484 - Document 87 (M.D. Tenn. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 85 ), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adop ted and approved. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and failure to obey Court Orders. Any pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. The pretrial conference set for December 28, 2012, and the jury trial set for January 8, 2013, are canceled. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 2/23/2012. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(hb)

Download PDF
Teasley v. Correctional Medical Services et al Doc. 87 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION RON TEASLEY v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, et al. ) ) ) NO. 3-11-0484 ) JUDGE CAMPBELL ) ) ORDER Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 85), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and failure to obey Court Orders. Any pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. The pretrial conference set for December 28, 2012, and the jury trial set for January 8, 2013, are canceled. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ TODD J. CAMPBELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.