Lyles v. Rutherford County Adult Detention Center et al, No. 3:2011cv00266 - Document 64 (M.D. Tenn. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER: The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Docket Nos. 48 and 52 ) are GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 5/23/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lyles v. Rutherford County Adult Detention Center et al Doc. 64 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION KENYATA K. LYLES v. RUTHERFORD COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER, et al. ) ) ) NO. 3-11-0266 ) JUDGE CAMPBELL ) ) ORDER Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 61), to which no Objections have been filed. Plaintiff also has failed to respond to Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment or Statements of Undisputed Facts. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment (Docket Nos. 48 and 52) are GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ TODD J. CAMPBELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
