Jacobs v. Caremark PhC, L.L.C., No. 3:2010cv00418 - Document 36 (M.D. Tenn. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. Any pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close this file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 10/15/10. (xc: Pro se party via reg & cert mail) (tmw)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jacobs v. Caremark PhC, L.L.C. Doc. 36 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ERMA M. JACOBS v. CAREMARK, PhC, LLC ) ) ) NO. 3-10-0418 ) JUDGE CAMPBELL ) ORDER Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 30), to which no Objections have been filed. All attempts at serving copies of the Report and Recommendation upon the Plaintiff have been returned as “undeliverable.” Docket Nos. 32, 33, 34, and 35. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. Any pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close this file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ TODD J. CAMPBELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
