Whitaker v. Tennessee Valley Authority, Board of Directors, No. 3:2008cv01225 - Document 23 (M.D. Tenn. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum issued contemporaneously herewith, Defendant Tennessee Valley Authority Board of Directors' Motion for Summary Judgment 8 is hereby GRANTED and Plaintiff Ronald W. Whitaker's Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Entry of this Order on the docket shall constitute entry of a final judgment in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58 and 79(a). Signed by Senior Judge Robert Echols on 4/14/10. (dt)

Download PDF
Whitaker v. Tennessee Valley Authority, Board of Directors Doc. 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION RONALD W. WHITAKER, Plaintiff, v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:08-1225 Judge Echols ORDER For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum issued contemporaneously herewith, Defendant Tennessee Valley Authority Board of Directors’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 8) is hereby GRANTED and Plaintiff Ronald W. Whitaker’s Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Entry of this Order on the docket shall constitute entry of a final judgment in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58 and 79(a). It is so ORDERED. ___________________________________ ROBERT L. ECHOLS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.