Walker v. Eli Lilly & Company et al - Document 36

FTT.PD ... ,,:..J.~ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA ~'2J 7J~ ~~ctffiK SOUTHERN DIVISION ***************************************************************************** JEROME WALKER, SR., Plaintiff, vs. PFIZER, INC., Defendant. APR 05 2011 ****************************************************************************** Pending is Pfizer's motion for summary judgment which was filed March 4,2011. 1 Pfizer filed a memorandum supporting its motion together with a statement of material facts.2 According to Pfizer, Walker has not designated an expert or experts and has not served an expert report, and the deadline for doing so was January 24, 2011. 3 Walker has not responded to the summary judgment motion, and the deadline for doing so was March 28, 2011.4 * * * * * * * * * * * CIV. 06-4165 ORDER \ I I ~ I I I f It is ORDERED that Pfizer's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.5 Dated April 5, 2011. BY THE COURT: t r l I r i ( Unit d tates Magistrate Judge I f l i f IDoc.33. 2Docs 34 & 35. 3Doc. 34, p. 1. 4Local Rules 7.1B & 56.1B. 5Doc.33. f t