Anderson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
Filing
42
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 37 24 it is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judges Report is ACCEPTED(Doc. # 37), the Defendants motion for summary judgment is GRANTED (Doc. # 24), and thisaction is DISMISSED.. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 3/17/09. (ahen, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION C.A. No. 0:08-1108-TLW-TER
) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) South Carolina Department of Corrections, ) et. al, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________)
Harold Anderson,
O RD ER
The Plaintiff brought this pro se civil action against the Defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. At the time he filed this action, the Plaintiff was an inmate in the South Carolina Department of Corrections. This matter is now before the undersigned for review of the Report and Recommendation ("the Report") filed February 19, 2009, by United States Magistrate Judge Tom Rogers, to whom this case had previously been assigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 73.02(B)(2) (D.S.C.). In his Report, Magistrate Judge Rogers recommends that the Defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted. No objections have been filed to the Report. This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that report. 28 U.S.C. § 636. In the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th 1
Cir. 1983). In light of this standard, the Court has carefully reviewed the Report and has concluded that the Report accurately summarizes this case and the applicable law. For the reasons articulated by the Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report is ACCEPTED (Doc. # 37), the Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED (Doc. # 24), and this action is DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. S/ Terry L. Wooten TERRY L. WOOTEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
March 17, 2009 Florence, South Carolina
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
