J.K. et al v. NEW BRIGHTON SCHOOL DISTRICT, No. 2:2014cv00002 - Document 38 (W.D. Pa. 2015)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 Motion for Summary Judgment. Specifically, the motion is granted to the extent that it seeks dismissal of the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denied to the exte nt that it seeks an entry of summary judgment. It is further ordered that this case is dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiffs' right to seek appropriate administrative relief. Signed by Judge Alan N. Bloch on 9/24/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum Opinion) (dpo) Modified on 9/24/2015. (dpo)

Download PDF
J.K. et al v. NEW BRIGHTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Doc. 38 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA J.K., by his next friend and parent D.K., Plaintiffs v. NEW BRIGHTON SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 14-2 ORDER AND NOW, this 24th day of September, 2015, upon consideration of Defendant New Brighton School District’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 27) and brief and statement of facts in support thereof (Doc. Nos. 28, 29, and 30), filed in the above captioned matter on November 14, 2014, and in further consideration of Plaintiffs’ responses thereto (Doc. Nos. 33 and 34), filed on December 29, 2014, and in consideration of Defendant’s replies (Doc. Nos. 35 and 36), both filed on January 12, 2015, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART for the reasons set forth in the Court’s Memorandum Opinion filed herewith. Specifically, it is granted to the extent that it seeks dismissal of the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denied to the extent that it seeks an entry of summary judgment. Accordingly, this Court having no jurisdiction to adjudicate Plaintiffs’ claims, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PLAINTIFFS’ RIGHT TO SEEK APPROPRIATE ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF. __s/Alan N. Bloch__________ Alan N. Bloch United States District Judge ecf: Counsel of Record Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.