BUCK v. PUGH et al
Filing
20
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 19 Report and Recommendations. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (the Petition) by a federal prisoner is dismissed. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 7/30/2013. (kly)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DALE BUCK,
)
)
)
vs.
) Civil Action No. 12-1669
) Judge Terrence F. McVerry/
) Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly
MICHAEL PUGH, Warden at Northeast
)
Ohio Corr. Ctr.; FRANK LECLAIRE, Case )
Mgr. Supv. At Renewal Center, Inc.,
)
Respondents. )
Petitioner,
ORDER
AND NOW, this 31st day of July, 2013, after the Petitioner, Dale
Buck, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Report and
Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge giving the
parties until July 19, 2013 to file written objections thereto, and no objections
having been filed to the report and recommendation, and upon independent
review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge=s Report
and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (the “Petition”) by a federal prisoner is
dismissed.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if any party wishes to appeal from this
Order a notice of appeal, as provided in Fed. R. App. P. 3, must be filed with
the Clerk of Court, United States District Court, at 700 Grant Street, Room
3110, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, within thirty (30) days.
s/ Terrence F. McVerry
TERRENCE F. McVERRY
United States District Judge
cc:
Honorable Maureen P. Kelly
United States Magistrate Judge
Dale Buck
3817 Prospect Street
Pittsburgh, PA 15234
All Counsel of Record Via CM-ECF
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
