JOY MM DELAWARE, INC. et al v. CINCINNATI MINE MACHINERY, CO, No. 2:2009cv01415 - Document 83 (W.D. Pa. 2011)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM and ORDER granting in part 59 Motion for Summary Judgment in that, as a matter of law, Claim 2 of the '932 Patent is invalid due to a violation of the best mode requirement, and defendant's DA-350 conveyor chain and flight asse mbly does not infringe Claim 2 of the '932 Patent; 59 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied in part, with prejudice and as a matter of law, in that the Russell '867 does not anticipate Claim 2 of the '932 Patent, and denying, withou t prejudice, the ability of plaintiff to collect enhanced damages; 54 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted on the issue of inequitable conduct; 51 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part, on the issue of invalidity due to anticipation, but denied in part as to the best mode requirement. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 12/5/11. (map)