SIFINSKI v. HARLOW (WARDEN) et al
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the action is DISMISSED as legally frivolous in accordance with 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(e) and the 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is DISMISSED as moot; adopting 3 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Chief Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 7/16/2013. (rlh)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RANDELL SIFINSKI,
Plaintiff,
v.
SUPERINTENDENT HARLOW, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 13-65 Erie
MEMORANDUM ORDER
This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on March 4, 2013, and
was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and
recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1), and
Rule 72 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.
The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 3], filed on
March 20, 2013, recommended that the action be dismissed as legally frivolous in
accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and that the Motion for Leave to Proceed In
Forma Pauperis [ECF No. 1] be dismissed as moot. Plaintiff was allowed fourteen (14)
days from the date of service to file Objections and no Objections were filed. After de
novo review of the documents in the case, together with the Report and
Recommendation, the following order is entered:
AND NOW, this 16th day of July, 2013;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the action is DISMISSED as legally frivolous in
accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma
Pauperis [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED as moot.
The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 3] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed
on March 20, 2013 is adopted as the opinion of the Court.
1
s/
cm:
Sean J. McLaughlin
Chief United States District Judge
All parties of record
Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
