MICHAELS v. ALEXANDRA
Filing
52
ORDER granting 37 Motion for Injunction: Plaintiff is hereby enjoined from any further filing in this matter without first seeking leave of Court to do so. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 7-11-13. (bfm )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DARREN MICHAELS,
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
vs.
)
BAJ ALEXANDRA and UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA, INC.
Defendants.
Civil Action No. 12-219E
)
)
)
)
)
)
MEMORANDUM ORDER
Pending before the Court is Defendants' "Motion for Injunction Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§1651 (a)," wherein they request "that this Court enjoin Plaintiff from filing further papers in
conjunction with this matter without first seeking leave to do so." Motion,
~
14.
The Court takes requests for a party to be precluded from freely filing documents in a
legal matter very seriously. However, given that the issues in this matter have been fully briefed
and that Plaintiff continues to file documents in which he treats himself as the "Court of
Record," even going as far as to stamp on one of this Court's Memorandum Orders
"IMPEACHED AND RESCINDED ORDER," see ECF Doc. #47, we will grant Defendants'
Motion for Injunction Pursuant to 28 U.S.c. § 1651(a).
AND NOW, this
~ day of July, 2013, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND
DECREED that Defendants' Motion for Injunction Pursuant to 28 U.S.c. §1651(a) is
GRANTED and that Plaintiff is hereby enjoined from any further filing in this matter without
first seeking leave of Court to do so.
'711~A~~tl t;~ M
Maurice B. Cohill, Ji..
Senior District Court Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
