LAUGHLIN v. PECK et al, No. 1:2010cv00213 - Document 67 (W.D. Pa. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re 44 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by DOUG PETROFF, YOMAN, VALERIE HIEBNER, HARLOW, WEST, SHANNON RANDALL, ROD SHOWER, SUSAN SENCHAK, EMEKA IBEMERE, ARYERS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 3/25/2013. (bb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DANIEL LAUGHLIN, ) ) ) Civil Action No. 10-213 E vs. ) ) Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly MS. PECK, DAVID SMITH, KIRK ) HENDERSON, EMEKA IBEMERE, SUSAN ) SENCHAK, SHANNON RANDALL, ) VALERIE HIEBNER, LT ARYERS, ) Re: ECF No. 44 Defendants. ) Plaintiff, ORDER AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2013, upon consideration of the Motion for Summary Judgment submitted on behalf of the Corrections Defendants and the response to the Motion submitted by Plaintiff, and for the reasons set forth in the Opinion filed contemporaneously with this Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion, [ECF No. 44] is granted . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the Plaintiff wishes to appeal from this Order he or she must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed. R. App. P., with the Clerk of Court, United States District Court, 700 Grant Street, Room 3110, Pittsburgh, PA 15219. BY THE COURT: /s/ Maureen P. Kelly MAUREEN P. KELLY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE cc: Daniel Laughlin GR-6308 SCI Mercer 801 Butler Pike Mercer, PA 16137 All counsel of record via CM/ECF

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.