HART et al v. DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al, No. 5:2020cv01462 - Document 13 (E.D. Pa. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, ECF NO. 10, IS DENIED. CONSISTENT WITH THE OPINION AND ORDER DATED JULY 8, 2020, SEE ECF NOS. 8-9, THIS MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TRIAL DIVISION, CIVIL CASE NO. 200202837. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND A CERTIFIED COPY OF THIS ORDER AND THE ORDER DATED JULY 8, 2020, ECF NO. 9, TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. THIS CASE SHALL REMAIN CLOSED SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 8/4/20. 8/4/20 ENTERED AND COPIES (NOT MAILED TO UNREP OR PROTHONOTARY AND E-MAILED.(er, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
HART et al v. DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al Doc. 13 Case 5:20-cv-01462-JFL Document 13 Filed 08/04/20 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________ JANET HART and PAUL HART, Plaintiffs, : : : v. : : DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, : DUKE REALTY CORPORATION, and : IH SERVICES, INC., : Defendants. : __________________________________________ No. 5:20-cv-01462 ORDER AND NOW, this 4th day of August, 2020, for the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No. 10, is DENIED; 2. Consistent with the Opinion and Order dated July 8, 2020, see ECF Nos. 8-9, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, Trial Division, Civil Case No. 200202837; 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a certified copy of this Order and the Order dated July 8, 2020, ECF No. 9, to the Prothonotary of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania; and 4. This case shall remain CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr._________ JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
