REICHARD v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, No. 5:2017cv02885 - Document 52 (E.D. Pa. 2018)

Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 41) IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 42) IS DENIED; AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 8/13/18. 8/13/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )

Download PDF
REICHARD v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Doc. 52 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GIOVANNA REICHARD, Plaintiff, v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-2885 ORDER AND NOW, this 13th day of August, 2018, after considering the defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 41), the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and alternative motion for judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52 (Doc. No. 42), the parties’ responses in opposition (Doc. Nos. 43–45), the defendant’s reply to the plaintiff’s response in opposition (Doc. No. 46), the administrative record (Doc. No. 40), and the parties’ pleadings (Doc. Nos. 2, 7); and after hearing oral argument on the parties’ cross-motions; accordingly, and for the reasons set forth in the separately filed memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 41) is GRANTED; 2. The plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and alternative motion for judgment (Doc. No. 42) is DENIED; 3. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the defendant, United of Omaha Life Insurance Company, and against the plaintiff, Giovanna Reichard, on her claim pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1) in the amended complaint; and Dockets.Justia.com 4. The clerk of court shall mark this matter as CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Edward G. Smith EDWARD G. SMITH, J. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.