LINDERMAN v. READING TRUCK BODY, LLC, No. 5:2017cv01120 - Document 20 (E.D. Pa. 2017)
Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS, ECF NO. 9, IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 9/29/17. 9/29/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
LINDERMAN v. READING TRUCK BODY, LLC Doc. 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ____________________________________ PATRICK LINDERMAN, Plaintiff, : : : v. : : READING TRUCK BODY, LLC, : Defendant. : ____________________________________ No. 5:17-cv-01120 ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of September, 2017, upon consideration of Defendant’s partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, Plaintiff’s Response thereto, and for the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: the Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 9, is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part as follows: 1. Defendant’s motion to dismiss the FMLA retaliation claim in Count I is GRANTED, and Count I is DISMISSED with prejudice. 2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss the ADA claim in Count II and the PHRA claim in Count IV is GRANTED in part only to the extent that these counts may have included an independent claim for failure to engage in the interactive process. 3. Defendant’s motion to dismiss any request for punitive damages and non- pecuniary compensatory damages in Count I is DENIED as moot. 4. Defendant’s motion to dismiss any request for punitive damages in Counts IV and V is GRANTED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr.___________ JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. United States District Court Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
