MARTINEZ v. FUDEMAN, No. 5:2016cv01290 - Document 49 (E.D. Pa. 2017)
Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DOC. NO. 22, IS GRANTED AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT READING AREA WATER AUTHORITY AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF. THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DOC. NO. 25, IS GRANTED AND JUDGMENT I S ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT, CITY OF READING PROPERTY MAINTENAINCE DIVISION AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF. THE MOTIONS IN LIMINE FILED BY THE PARTIES (DOC. NOS. 33, 34, 35, 36, AND 37) ARE DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 9/29/17. 9/29/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
MARTINEZ v. FUDEMAN Doc. 49 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GILBERT M. MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF READING PROPERTY MAINTENANCE DIVISION, READING AREA WATER AUTHORITY, Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-1290 ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of September, 2017, after considering the motions for summary judgment separately filed by the defendants, City of Reading Property Maintenance Division and Reading Area Water Authority (Doc. Nos. 22, 25); and after considering the defendants’ statements of undisputed material facts, supporting briefs, and attached exhibits (Doc. Nos. 22, 23, 25, 26); and after considering the response to the motions for summary judgment and the exhibits attached thereto filed by the pro se plaintiff, Gilbert M. Martinez; and after hearing oral argument from the parties on April 25, 2017; and for the reasons set forth in the separately filed memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant, Reading Area Water Authority (Doc. No. 22), is GRANTED and judgment is entered in favor of the defendant, Reading Area Water Authority, and against the plaintiff, Gilbert M. Martinez; 2. The motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant, City of Reading Property Maintenance Division (Doc. No. 25), is GRANTED and judgment is entered in favor of the defendant, City of Reading Property Maintenance Division, and against the plaintiff, Gilbert M. Martinez; Dockets.Justia.com 3. The motions in limine filed by the parties (Doc. Nos. 33, 34, 35, 36, 37) are DENIED AS MOOT; and 4. The clerk of court shall mark this matter as CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Edward G. Smith EDWARD G. SMITH, J. 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
