GINTHER v. GOLDEN STATE CLAIMS ADJUSTERS, INC. et al, No. 5:2016cv00686 - Document 30 (E.D. Pa. 2017)

Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED; AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 9/29/17. 9/29/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )

Download PDF

GINTHER v. GOLDEN STATE CLAIMS ADJUSTERS, INC. et al Doc. 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COLLIN R. GINTHER, d/b/a BUXMONT GROUT CARE, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-686 v. PREFERRED CONTRACTORS INSURANCE COMPANY RISK RETENTION GROUP, LLC, Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of September, 2017, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; and 3. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J. Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.