CASTROVINCI et al v. EASTON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT et al, No. 5:2015cv02980 - Document 50 (E.D. Pa. 2017)
Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 43) IS HEREBY DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 6/27/17. 6/27/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CASTROVINCI et al v. EASTON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT et al Doc. 50 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN CASTROVINCI; SUSAN M. MCGINLEY, ED.D; JAMES L. POKRIVSAK, JR.; and DAWN REAGLE, Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2980 v. EASTON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT; FRANK PINTABONE, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the President of the Easton Area School Board; ROBERT FEHNEL, Individually and in His Official Capacity as a Member of the Easton Area School Board; KERRI LEONARDELLISON, Individually and in Her Capacity as a Former Member of the Easton Area School Board; JANET MATTHEWS, Individually and in Her Capacity as a Former Member of the Easton Area School Board; WILLIAM RIDER, Individually and in His Capacity as a Former Member of the Easton Area School Board, Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2017, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 43) and all supporting and opposing papers, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
