AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. STEVENS & RICCI, INC. et al, No. 5:2012cv07228 - Document 59 (E.D. Pa. 2015)
Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT AUTO-OWNERS' MOTION (DOCKET NO. 43) IS GRANTED AND HYMED'S CROSS-MOTION IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE STATISTICALLY. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HENRY S. PERKIN ON 3/31/15. 3/31/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP AND E-MAILED.(ky, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. STEVENS & RICCI, INC. et al Doc. 59 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________________ : AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, : : v. : No. 12-7228 : STEVENS & RICCI, INC. and : THE HYMED GROUP CORPORATION, : Defendants. : ________________________________________________: ORDER AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2015, following oral argument held on December 4, 2014 regarding the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff, Auto-Owners Insurance Company (“Auto-Owners”) (Dkt. No. 43), on July 15, 2014; the Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant, The Hymed Group Corporation (“Hymed”) (Dkt. No. 47), filed on September 30, 2014; Auto-Owners’ Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Hymed’s Cross-Motion (Dkt. No. 52) filed October 30, 2014; Hymed’s Reply to Auto-Owners’ Response (Dkt. No. 53) filed November 14, 2014; and for the reasons expressed in the foregoing Memorandum Opinion, IT IS ORDERED that Auto-Owners’ Motion (Docket No. 43) is GRANTED and Hymed’s Cross-Motion is DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE STATISTICALLY. BY THE COURT: /s/ Henry S. Perkin HENRY S. PERKIN, United States Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
