SCHWARTZ et al v. ACCURATUS CORPORATION et al, No. 5:2012cv06189 - Document 98 (E.D. Pa. 2017)
Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED, AND COUNTS I, IX AND X MAY PROCEED AS AGAINST DEFENDANT ACCURATUS. ALL OTHER COUNTS REMAIN DISMISSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PRIOR ORDER, AS THE THIRD CIRCUIT VACATED ONLY THE DISMISSAL OF COUNT I. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 3/30/17. 3/30/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
SCHWARTZ et al v. ACCURATUS CORPORATION et al Doc. 98 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BRENDA ANN SCHWARTZ and PAUL GRANT SCHWARTZ, Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-6189 v. ACCURATUS CORPORATION, in its own right and as successor in interest to Accuratus Ceramic Corporation, Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2017, upon consideration of the parties’ supplemental briefing following remand, after argument held, and for the reasons more fully stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED, and Counts I, IX, and X may proceed as against Defendant Accuratus. All other counts remain dismissed in accordance with prior order, as the Third Circuit vacated only the dismissal of Count I. BY THE COURT: s/s JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
