TYCO FIRE PRODUCTS LP v. VICTAULIC COMPANY
Filing
53
ORDER THAT PLFF'S MOTION TO STAY IS DENIED; IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW & DEFT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SURREPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW ARE GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER OR DERED THAT PARTIES SHALL MEET & CONFER AND THEN SHALL PROPOSE TO THE COURT A REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER WITH RESPECT TO CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING BY 10/19/2011. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 10/4/11.10/5/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TYCO FIRE PRODUCTS LP,
Plaintiff,
v.
VICTAULIC COMPANY,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 10-4645
O R D E R
AND NOW, this 4th day of October, 2011, it is hereby
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to stay (doc. no. 41) is DENIED;
It is hereby further ORDERED, that Plaintiff’s motion
for leave to file a reply memorandum of law (doc. no. 46) and
Defendant’s motion for leave to file a surreply memorandum of law
(doc. no. 50) are GRANTED;1
It is hereby further ORDERED, that the parties’ shall
meet and confer, and then shall propose to the Court a revised
scheduling order with respect to claim construction briefing by
October 19, 2011.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.
1. The Court considered the substance of both memoranda in its
ruling on Plaintiff’s motion to say.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
