WHITE v. BROMMER et al, No. 5:2009cv04353 - Document 46 (E.D. Pa. 2011)
Court Description: OPINION ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANTS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS JACK BROMMER, BOROUGH OF COL UMBIA AND MATTHEW LEDDY AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF BRIAN WHITE ON PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 8/16/11. 8/17/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BRIAN WHITE, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff vs. JACK BROMMER, BOROUGH OF COLUMBIA and MATTHEW LEDDY, Defendants Civil Action No. 09-cv-04353 O R D E R Now, this 16th day of August, 2011, upon consideration of the following documents: (1) Motion of Defendants for Summary Judgment filed April 7, 2011 (Document 33); together with Defendants Brief in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment, which brief was filed April 7, 2011 (Document 33-1); and Defendants Statement of Undisputed Material Facts filed April 7, 2011 (Document 33-23); (2) Plaintiff s Brief in Response to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, which brief was filed April 28, 2011 (Document 35); and (3) Plaintiff s Motion for Summary Judgment filed April 14, 2011 (Document 34); together with Plaintiff s Memorandum of Law in Support of His Motion for Summary Judgment, which memorandum was filed April 14, 2011 (Document 34); (4) Defendants Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff s Motion For Summary Judgment, which brief was filed May 4, 2011 (Document 36-1); together with Defendants Response to Plaintiff s Material Facts for Summary Judgment, which response was filed May 4, 2011 (Document 36); and (5) Amended Complaint filed October 22, 2010 (Document 19); and for the reasons expressed in the accompanying Opinion, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion of Defendants for Summary Judgment is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff s Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of defendants Jack Brommer, Borough of Columbia and Matthew Leddy and against plaintiff Brian White on plaintiff s Amended Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: /s/ JAMES KNOLL GARDNER James Knoll Gardner United States District Judge -ii-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
