MAGGITTI v. BINDER et al, No. 2:2023cv01184 - Document 25 (E.D. Pa. 2023)

Court Description: OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DOC. NOS. 16, 17) ARE GRANTED. PRO SE PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 1) IS DISMISSED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THE CASE. ALL REMAINING OPEN MOTIONS WILL BE DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 12/1/23. 12/1/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

Download PDF
MAGGITTI v. BINDER et al Doc. 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA URVE MAGGITTI, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-1184 v. HON. BRET M. BINDER, in his official capacity, et al., Defendants. URVE MAGGITTI, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-2273 v. HON. BRET M. BINDER, et al., Defendants. URVE MAGGITTI, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-3185 v. HON. JOHN P. CAPUZZI, sr., in his official capacity, et al., Defendants. URVE MAGGITTI, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-4359 v. MAHON, et al., Defendants. 1 Dockets.Justia.com ORDER AND NOW, this 1st day of December 2023, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss in Civil Action No. 23-1184 (Doc. Nos. 16, 17), pro se Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 18), Defendants’ Reply (Doc. No. 20), Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss in Civil Action No. 23-2273 (Doc. Nos. 17, 21, 27, 33, 38, 39), pro se Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (Doc. Nos. 30, 34), Defendants’ Reply (Doc. No. 44), Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss in Civil Action No. 23-3185 (Doc. Nos. 10, 12), pro se Plaintiff’s Responses in Opposition (Doc. Nos. 13, 14), pro se Plaintiff’s Complaint in Civil Action No. 23-4359 (Doc. No. 1), and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. In Civil Action No. 23-1184, a. Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 16, 17) are GRANTED. b. Pro se Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED. c. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. d. All remaining open Motions will be DENIED as MOOT. 2. In Civil Action No. 23-2273, a. Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 17, 21, 27, 33, 38, 39) are GRANTED. b. Plaintiff’s pro se Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 5) is DISMISSED without prejudice. 3. In Civil Action No. 23-3185, a. Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 10, 12) are GRANTED. b. Plaintiff’s pro se Complaint (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED. c. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. d. All remaining open Motions will be DENIED as MOOT. 2 4. In Civil Action No. 23-4349, a. Plaintiff’s pro se Complaint (Civ. No. 23-4359, Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. 5. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file one (1) Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of this Order encompassing Civil Action Nos. 23-2273 and 23-4349. Because these actions are consolidated, Plaintiff should file the Amended Complaint only under Civil Action No. 23-2273. BY THE COURT: /s/ Joel H. Slomsky __________________________________ JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J. 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.