SHELLINGTON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, No. 2:2023cv00658 - Document 18 (E.D. Pa. 2023)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED. THE FINAL DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER DENYING SHELLINGTON BENEFITS IS VACATED, AND THE CASE IS REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THE COURTS MEMORANDUM OPINION ACCOMPANYING THIS ORDER. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE CRAIG M. STRAW ON 12/28/23. 12/28/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
SHELLINGTON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Doc. 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LARRY TYRONE SHELLINGTON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 23-cv-658 ORDER AND NOW on this 28th day of December 2023, upon consideration of Plaintiff Larry Tyrone Shellington’s Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of his Request for Review (Doc. 14), the Commissioner’s Response (Doc. 15), and Plaintiff’s Reply (Doc. 16), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Request for Review is GRANTED; 2. The final decision of the Commissioner denying Shellington benefits is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the Court’s Memorandum Opinion accompanying this Order; and 3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: /s/ Craig M. Straw CRAIG M. STRAW U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
