LAW OFFICES OF BRUCE J. CHASAN, LLC et al v. PIERCE et al, No. 2:2023cv00648 - Document 25 (E.D. Pa. 2024)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT, FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION, DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. ACCORDINGLY, ALL CLAIMS ASSERTED AGAINST DEFENDANTS JOHN M. PIERCE, JAMES D. BAINBRIDGE, PIERCE BAINBRIDGE BECK PRICE & HECHT, LLP, BAINBRIDGE LAW APC, PIERCE BAINBRIDGE P.C., AND JOHN PIERCE LAW, P.C. ARE DISMISSED.SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 3/27/24. 3/27/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW OFFICES OF BRUCE J. CHASAN, LLC, et al. Plaintiffs v. JOHN M. PIERCE, ESQ., et al. Defendants : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-0648 ORDER AND NOW, this 27th day of March 2024, upon consideration of Defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), (ECF 12), Plaintiffs’ response in opposition, (ECF 15), Defendants’ reply, (ECF 18), Plaintiffs’ sur-reply, (ECF 23), and the allegations in the complaint, (ECF 1), it is hereby ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Accordingly, all claims asserted against Defendants John M. Pierce, James D. Bainbridge, Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht, LLP, Bainbridge Law APC, Pierce Bainbridge P.C., and John Pierce Law, P.C. are DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Nitza I. Quiñones Alejandro NITZA I. QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO Judge, United States District Court
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
