SCHABACKER et al v. FERENS, No. 2:2022cv03778 - Document 62 (E.D. Pa. 2024)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 43 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT ON COUNT I OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND COUNT I IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED AS TO ALL OF THE REMAINING COUNTS IN THE AMENDED COMPLAINT.SIGNED BY HONORABLE KAI N. SCOTT ON 2/21/24. 2/21/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
SCHABACKER et al v. FERENS Doc. 62 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARCUS SCHABACKER and EMERGENCY CARE RESEARCH INSTITUTE doing business as ECRI, Plaintiffs, : : : : : : CIVIL NO. 22-3778 : : : v. STEVEN FERENS, Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 21st day of February, 2024, upon consideration of Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant Steven Ferens (ECF No. 43), Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 45), Reply Brief in Support of Defendant Steven Ferens’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 47), and Plaintiffs’ Sur-Reply Brief in Support of Their Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 49), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows: 1. Summary judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendant on Count I of the Amended Complaint, and Count I is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. Summary judgment is DENIED as to all of the remaining counts in the Amended Complaint. BY THE COURT: /s/ Kai N. Scott HON. KAI N. SCOTT United States District Court Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
