HARRIS et al v. KRASNER et al, No. 2:2022cv00839 - Document 37 (E.D. Pa. 2023)
Court Description: OPINION ORDER THAT KRASNER AND KEANS MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 23) IS GRANTED. THE CITYS MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 25) IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 5/12/23. 5/12/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
HARRIS et al v. KRASNER et al Doc. 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CRYSTAL HARRIS, et al., Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. 22-839 v. LAWRENCE KRASNER, et al., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 12th day of May 2023, upon consideration of Defendants Philadelphia District Attorney Office, District Attorney Larry Krasner, and Assistant District Attorney Brian Kean’s (“Krasner and Kean”) Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 23), Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 27), Defendants Kranser and Kean’s Reply (Doc. No. 29), Plaintiff’s Sur-Reply (Doc. No. 35), Defendant City of Philadelphia’s (“City”) Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 25), Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 30), and Defendant City’s Reply (Doc. No. 33), it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Krasner and Kean’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 23) is GRANTED. 2. The City’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 25) is GRANTED. 3. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: /s/ Joel H. Slomsky ____________________ JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
