GRISWOLD, MD MPH v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY et al, No. 2:2022cv00568 - Document 36 (E.D. Pa. 2024)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED ON PLAINTIFFS DISCRIMINATORY TERMINATION CLAIM. THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED AS TO PLAINTIFFS RETALIATION CLAIM. THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED AS TO PLAINTIFFS HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT CLAIM.SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 3/1/24. 3/4/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHARON GRISWOLD, MD MPH Plaintiff v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY, et al. Defendants : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 22-0568 ORDER AND NOW, this 1st day of March 2024, upon consideration of Defendants’ partial motion for summary judgment, (ECF 28), Plaintiff’s response in opposition, (ECF 29), and Defendants’ reply, (ECF 32), it is hereby ORDERED, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, that: 1. The motion for summary judgment is GRANTED on Plaintiff’s discriminatory termination claim; 2. The motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiff’s retaliation claim; and 3. The motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiff’s hostile work environment claim. BY THE COURT: /s/ Nitza I. Quiñones Alejandro NITZA I. QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO Judge, United States District Court
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
