GIVEY v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, EASTERN DISTRICT OF PA et al, No. 2:2022cv00298 - Document 30 (E.D. Pa. 2023)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT, FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION, WILLIAMS MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. ACCORDINGLY, THE PETITION IS DISMISSED, IN ITS ENTIRETY, PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(B)(1), FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 7/14/23. 7/14/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
GIVEY v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, EASTERN DISTRICT OF PA et al Doc. 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RYAN P. GIVEY Petitioner, pro se v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al. Respondents : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 22-0298 ORDER AND NOW, this 14th day of July 2023, upon consideration of Respondent Jennifer Arbittier Williams’ (“Williams”) motion to dismiss, [ECF 21], Petitioner Ryan P. Givey’s (“Petitioner”) response in opposition, [ECF 22], Williams’ reply, [ECF 24], Petitioner’s sur-reply, [ECF 27], and the allegations in the petition for a writ of mandamus (the “Petition”), [ECF 1], it is hereby ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Williams’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Petition is DISMISSED, in its entirety, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. BY THE COURT: /s/ Nitza I. Quiñones Alejandro NITZA I. QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO Judge, United States District Court Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
