THOMPSON v. IKEA US RETAIL LLC, No. 2:2021cv05288 - Document 29 (E.D. Pa. 2023)
Court Description: OPINION ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 23) IS DENIED. THE CLAIMS THAT REMAIN IN THIS CASE AGAINST DEFENDANT ARE FMLA INTERFERENCE AND FMLA RETALIATION AS ALLEGED IN COUNT I. THE CLAIMS ALLEGED IN COUNTS II AND III OF THE COMPLAINT ARE WITHDRAWN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 4/27/23. 4/27/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
THOMPSON v. IKEA US RETAIL LLC Doc. 29 Case 2:21-cv-05288-JHS Document 29 Filed 04/27/23 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LORI THOMPSON, CIVIL ACTION NO. 21-5288 Plaintiff, v. IKEA US RETAIL, LLC, Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 27th day of April 2023, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 23), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 26), and Defendant’s Reply (Doc. No. 27), it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 23) is DENIED. The claims that remain in this case against Defendant are FMLA interference and FMLA retaliation as alleged in Count I. 2. The claims alleged in Counts II and III of the Complaint are WITHDRAWN. 1 BY THE COURT: /s/ Joel H. Slomsky _____________________ JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J. 1 In Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment, she withdrew (1) the Age Discrimination in Employment Act claim alleged Count II, and (2) the Maryland Fair Employment Practices Act claim alleged in Count III. (See Doc. No. 26-2 at 5 n.1.) Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
