SJ Abstract d/b/a InterstateAbstract.com et al, No. 2:2021cv01334 - Document 12 (E.D. Pa. 2021)

Court Description: ORDERED CONSISTENT WITH THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION, THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED AS TO GABERS BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIM (COUNT I); 2. THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED AS TO INTERSTATEABSTRACTS BREACH OF CONTRA CT CLAIM (COUNT I); 3. THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED AS TO GABERS INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS CLAIM (COUNT II); 4. THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED AS TO GABERS NEGLIGENT INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS CLAIM (COUNT III); 5. THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED AS TO INTERSTATEABSTRACTS CLAIM UNDER THE FAIR CREDIT REPORTING ACT, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 ET SEQ., (COUNT IV); AND 6. THE MOTION IS TO DISMISS GRANTED AS TO INTERSTATEABSTRACTS UNFAIR COMPETITION CLAIM (COUNT V). SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 10/14/21. 10/14/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )

Download PDF
SJ Abstract d/b/a InterstateAbstract.com et al Doc. 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SJ ABSTRACT d/b/a INTERSTATEABSTRACT.COM, et al. Plaintiffs : : : : : : : : : : v. OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Defendant CIVIL ACTION NO. 21-1334 ORDER AND NOW, this 14th day of October 2021, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Old Republic National Title Insurance Company pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), [ECF 9], the response in opposition jointly filed by Plaintiffs SJ Abstract d/b/a InterstateAbstract.com (“InterstateAbstract”) and Ramon Gaber (“Gaber”), [ECF 10], and the allegations in the complaint, it is hereby ORDERED, consistent with the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, that: 1. The motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to Gaber’s breach of contract claim (Count I); 2. The motion to dismiss is DENIED as to InterstateAbstract’s breach of contract claim (Count I); 3. The motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to Gaber’s intentional infliction of emotional distress claim (Count II); 4. The motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to Gaber’s negligent infliction of emotional distress claim (Count III); 5. The motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to InterstateAbstract’s claim under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., (Count IV); and 6. The motion is to dismiss GRANTED as to InterstateAbstract’s unfair competition claim (Count V). BY THE COURT: /s/ Nitza I. Quiñones Alejandro NITZA I. QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO Judge, United States District Court Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.