WILLIAMS v. ELLIOTT et al, No. 2:2018cv05418 - Document 145 (E.D. Pa. 2021)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT THE CROSS-MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. ACCORDINGLY, ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT MOSLEY ARE DISMISSED. THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS DENIED. CONSEQUENTLY, THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SET ASIDE THE ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT MOSLEY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 7/23/21. 7/23/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO COUNSEL OR UNREPS; E-MAILED.(amas, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
WILLIAMS v. ELLIOTT et al Doc. 145 Case 2:18-cv-05418-NIQA Document 145 Filed 07/23/21 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TERRY WILLIAMS Plaintiff, pro se v. MELISSA ARNETTE ELLIOTT a/k/a MISSY “MISDEMEANOR” ELLIOTT, et al. Defendants : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-5418 ORDER AND NOW, this 23rd day of July 2021, upon consideration of pro se Plaintiff Terry Williams’ motion for default judgment filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55, [ECF 104], the opposition to motion for default judgment and cross-motion to set aside the entry of default and to dismiss the fourth amended complaint filed by Defendant Timothy Mosley a/k/a Timbaland (“Defendant Mosley”), [ECF 107], the responses, replies, and sur-replies filed by Plaintiff, [ECF 111, 120], and by Defendant Mosley, [ECF 114, 124], and the allegations in Plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint, [ECF 91], it is hereby ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion: 1. The cross-motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Accordingly, all claims against Defendant Mosley are dismissed. 2. The motion for default judgment is DENIED. Consequently, the Clerk of Court is directed to set aside the entry of default against Defendant Mosley. BY THE COURT: /s/ Nitza I. Quiñones Alejandro NITZA I. QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO Judge, United States District Court Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
