ZAPATA v. PECO et al, No. 2:2017cv03699 - Document 4 (E.D. Pa. 2017)
Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 9/14/17. 9/14/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE'. (ky, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
ZAPATA v. PECO et al Doc. 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MONSERRATE ZAPATA v. PECO, PHILADELPHIA, ELECTRIC COMPANY : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-3699 ORDER AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2017, upon consideration of plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) and his pro se complaint, it is ORDERED that: 1. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. 2. The complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for the reasons discussed in the Court’s memorandum. 3. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. BY THE COURT: /s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr. JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR., J. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
