DIMATTEO v. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, No. 2:2017cv00898 - Document 19 (E.D. Pa. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT PLAINTIFF'S ADEA AND PHRA CLAIMS ARE PREMISED ON DEFENDANT'S FAILURE TO REHIRE HIM AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS DENIED TO THE EXTENT PLAINTIFF'S ADEA AND PHRA CLAIMS ARE PREMISED ON DEFENDANT TERMINATING HIS EMPLOYMENT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 11/15/2017. 11/15/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NICHOLAS DIMATTEO, JR., Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, Defendant. NO. 17-0898 ORDER AND NOW, this 15th day of November, 2017, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 15), Plaintiff’s Response thereto (ECF No. 16), and Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Response (ECF No. 17), IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED to the extent Plaintiff’s ADEA and PHRA claims are premised on Defendant’s failure to rehire him, and 2. Defendant’s Motion is DENIED to the extent Plaintiff’s ADEA and PHRA claims are premised on Defendant terminating his employment. BY THE COURT: /s/Wendy Beetlestone, J. _______________________________ WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
