PARKER v. PAYPAL, INC. et al, No. 2:2016cv04786 - Document 75 (E.D. Pa. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER THAT THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION FILED ON THIS DAY, THAT MOVING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTEDA ND MOVING DEFENDANTS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJDUICE FROM THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 8/16/17. 8/16/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, UNREP AND EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
PARKER v. PAYPAL, INC. et al Doc. 75 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GORDON ROY PARKER Plaintiff, pro se v. PAYPAL, INC., et al. Defendants : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-4786 ORDER AND NOW, this 16th day of August 2017, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Amazon.com, Inc., and Amazon Web Services, Inc., (“Moving Defendants”), [ECF 38], the response in opposition filed by Plaintiff Gordon Roy Parker (“Plaintiff”), [ECF 42], Moving Defendants’ reply, [ECF 65], and the allegations contained in Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, [ECF 47], it is hereby ORDERED, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion filed on this day, that Moving Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and Moving Defendants are DISMISSED, with prejudice, from this case. BY THE COURT: /s/ Nitza I. Quiñones Alejandro NITZA I. QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO Judge, United States District Court Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
